Press "Enter" to skip to content

Month: January 2025

Reality, Roman Salutes, and Opposition

“It might be helpful for you to know that you are not alone. And that in the long, twilight struggle which lies ahead of us, there is the possibility of hope.”

“The Long Twilight Struggle.” Babylon 5, created and written by J. Michael Straczynski, Season 2, Episode 20, 1995.


Here are the stories that caught my attention as I cleared my browser tabs:

  • The dangers of treating Donald Trump as a normal politician;
  • How news organizations sanitized Elon Musk’s Nazi salutes;
  • Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde’s heroic call for mercy and the MAGA backlash she faces;
  • Will Congress defend its Constitutional powers in the face of Trump’s impoundment executive orders—or is our Constitution meaningless;
  • Trump’s PayPal Mafia supporters have many ties to apartheid South Africa;
  • Ken White explains how every person can fight Trumpism through kindness, decency, and fidelity to American values; and
  • Let’s not allow Trump to rewrite the history of the January 6, 2021, insurrection he instigated.

Here we go. I’m glad you’re here.

Jack Rooney in Netflix’s The Three-Body Problem

#1

The Moon Is Down (A.R. Moxon, The Reframe, Link to Article)

When you treat a party or person or idea as illegitimate, people start to believe in the illegitimacy, even if the target is legitimate. If you treat a party or a person or an idea as legitimate, people start to believe in the legitimacy, even if the target is illegitimate. When you pursue your principles with determination, people believe you have principles, and if they share those principles, they will give you their loyalty. As it turns out, people with evil principles are very loyal to the party that promises evil and delivers it.

There’s a flip side to that coin. When a party actually is illegitimate, and you treat them as legitimate anyway, then people start to think you don’t believe anything.

Obama will attend Donald Trump’s inauguration, by the way.

Joe Biden greeted Donald Trump and his wife today with a big grin, by the way.

“Welcome home,” he said.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

One of the reasons I am so focused on the need for the Democratic Party to start acting like an opposition party is this dynamic. President Donald Trump won a close election, but only after instigating an insurrection against the government. Trump is not a normal politician.

Yet Democratic leaders continue to treat him like one. Why did Biden welcome him home? Why were all of those Democratic elected officials at the inauguration? Why are so many Democrats voting for Trump’s cabinet nominees or discussing looking forward to finding common ground?

Democrats correctly described Donald Trump as a danger to our democracy for years. That fact didn’t end with the election. Trump’s first week of executive orders confirms he does not care about our Democratic system.

Democratic political leaders need to oppose. We did not elect them to be a junior partner in Trump’s reign of unconstitutional terror. We did not elect them to enable the implementation of Project 2025.

I mean, it’s a bit alarming when former Vice President Mike Pence’s advocacy group is doing more to try to stop Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination than the Democrats.

“The duty of an Opposition is to oppose,” is a quote often attributed to Lord Randolph Churchill, Winston’s father. Opposing these unconstitutional seizures of executive power, appointments of unqualified nominees, and the rhetorical dehumanization of transgender people and immigrants would demonstrate the highest loyalty to our country and its Constitution.

If the current leadership is unwilling to engage in the necessary political fights, they should step aside for those who understand what is at stake.

The Long Twilight Struggle is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider joining for free or becoming a paid subscriber to buy me a coffee to drink while I’m writing this newsletter.

#2

News Organizations Are Tiptoeing Around What We All Saw (Parker Molloy, The Present Age, Link to Article)

We’re living in a media environment where the truth has become nearly impossible to state directly. A billionaire can make a gesture that neo-Nazis celebrate as explicitly supporting their cause, and major news organizations feel compelled to describe it as “exuberant” rather than risk saying what it actually appeared to be.

Context matters here. This isn’t just some random rich guy making an awkward wave. This is someone who has tweeted agreement with an antisemitic conspiracy theories and recently allied himself with the far-right AfD party in Germany.

When neo-Nazis and white nationalists are celebrating your gesture while mainstream media outlets are afraid to even describe it accurately, something has gone terribly wrong with our ability to tell the truth about power.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

I do not believe there is any other good faith explanation for what Elon Musk does in this video clip than the obvious one: he’s performing a Nazi salute at a public political event celebrating the inauguration of President Donald Trump.

Twice.

A gif of Elon Musk’s “high-energy” gesture during President Trump’s inauguration celebration on January 20, 2025.
A gif of Elon Musk’s “high-energy” gesture during President Trump’s inauguration celebration on January 20, 2025.

It would be awful enough if this was just Elon Musk, a private citizen. But Musk may be the de facto co-president for now.

And as Molloy explains, Musk has made a bunch of alt-right actions in recent weeks—and as the Project on Government Oversight’s Nick Schwellenbach reports, the federal government’s human resources agency is now filled with people connected to Musk’s businesses.

Here’s a good test for all of these people, like MAGA’s Scott Jennings, who try to pretend we didn’t see what we saw.

During a recent CNN panel debate, Catherine Rampell asked Jennings to do the obvious: if Musk’s gesture is normal, do it right now.

He didn’t.

Yes, the Romans made a gesture like this one. But since 1945, it has been clear to everyone what this gesture means. And there is a reason Neo-Nazis are celebrating.

It is a major problem when our major media outlets refuse to report what we all can see and go out of their way to edit the news from their recaps. People can turn to Fox News and MAGA media for this kind of gaslighting. No one wants to watch or read poor carbon copies of the real thing.

And it’s also a major problem when, as a Columbia Journalism Review story explains, the White House press corps is so excited to engage with Trump and are relieved that they no longer have to deal with former President Biden’s press operation. They sure missed those insider book deals over the past four years.

#3

One voice begging for mercy (Melissa Ryan, Ctrl Alt Right Delete, Link to Article)

Fear is a weapon Donald Trump wields expertly and with precision. Even Republicans know that crossing Trump might lead to MAGA foot soldiers coming for you. Starting with the 1,500 insurrectionists Trump just pardoned. Fear is also the reason, understandably, why you haven’t seen as many organized protests and direct actions against the incoming Administration. Trump wants all of us, to his opposition to his closest supporters to fear him and his power. This time around, he’s had incredible success creating that culture.

Knowing all this, one can’t help but admire Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde for speaking truth to power — right in power’s face. There’s no personal upside for her here. There is little to be gained other than being the enemy of the day in right-wing media and the threats and harassment she’s undoubtedly now receiving. Watching her explain her decision on CNN, I’m struck by her bravery and humility. All while clearly grappling with the moment herself.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

Episcopal Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde was respectful. She did not attack President Trump. She was true to the teachings of Jesus in her call for “mercy.”

For this she was attacked viciously, faced demands to apologize, was called Satan, and received death threats because MAGA attacks anyone who dares not fully support their leader. As Parker Molloy explained:

The response was swift and severe. Trump himself attacked her on Truth Social, calling her a “Radical Left hard line Trump hater” and demanding an apology. He told reporters the service was “not too exciting” and that organizers “could do much better.”

But that was just the beginning. Right-wing media launched an all-out assault on Budde that revealed exactly how power plans to deal with dissent in Trump’s second term. Fox News host Greg Gutfeld literally called her “Satan.” His colleague Sean Hannity described it as a “disgraceful prayer full of fearmongering and division.” Fox & Friends co-host Lawrence Jones called Budde’s words “radical leftist.” The Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh declared that “hell exists for people like Mariann” and called her “exhibit A for why women should not be pastors, priests, or bishops.”

Even members of Congress got in on the act, with one Republican suggesting that the American-born bishop should be “added to the deportation list.”

None of that should be considered normal. Or very Christian.

I’ve frequently been critical of White Christian Nationalists in this space. I will continue to be. Trump’s executive orders are full of those theocratic ideas.

But Bishop Budde’s remarks remind me that I want us to consider whether religious people who reject the teachings of Jesus can really be considered Christians.

I don’t doubt they are religious. But the Sermon on the Mount and the Golden Rule exist. The Eye of the Needle parable exists. There is an entire Commandment that forbids the bearing of false witness. I could continue.

Bishop Budde’s sermon was so refreshing because so few have dared to disagree with Trump in his presence. She also lived her religion’s teachings.

I hope more people will follow Bishop Budde’s example.

#4

Trump’s Most Lawless Action Yet (David Dayen, The American Prospect, Link to Article)

It does not matter what executive action Trump takes; he cannot limit, halt, or refuse to carry out spending authorized and appropriated by Congress and signed into law.

This action is willful and deliberate. It is designed to pick a fight over spending, and relies on fanciful theories that would render Congress a vestigial organ in the governmental order. It means to nullify the congressional spending power by presidential fiat. And it hopes to spark litigation whereby the judiciary assents to that transfer of power, emasculating itself in the process.

The Prospect documented these attempted dictatorial maneuvers last July. Russell Vought, Trump’s handpicked selection to run OMB when confirmed, has laid out his strategy in detail. He wants to resurrect the practice of withholding congressionally appropriated funds known as impoundment, which violates federal law and Supreme Court precedent.

In Vought’s opinion, the president has inherent authority as head of the executive branch to impound funds that differ from his policy viewpoints. That’s really it; Vought simply asserts that congressional appropriations are a ceiling, so the president doesn’t have to distribute them all out.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

If President Trump gets away with this power grab, our Constitution will have been rendered meaningless.

There is a law that forbids the impoundment practice. Article I of the Constitution gives the Legislative Branch the spending power. Article II compels the president “to take care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Train v. City of New York (1975) that presidents do not have this power.

Trump could ask Congress to send him bills to allow spending to adhere to his policy goals. But he can’t ignore laws that have been enacted.

Well, unless there are five Supreme Court Justices who are willing to render themselves, and the Congress, irrelevant.

The Founding Generation assumed that the separation of powers would help prevent the rise of a tyrant because each branch would zealously defend its powers. We could rely on those checks-and-balances and separation-of-powers to keep potential tyrants in check.

So, in that rational world, Republican and Democratic Members of Congress would be joining together to condemn Trump’s Executive Orders and preparing to impeach him if he didn’t back down. We also wouldn’t need to worry about what the Supreme Court might do.

But we live in this world. Alas. Sure, some Congressmembers have complained and (gasp!) even posted to social media. Emergency meetings have been promised for later in the week. And the Supreme Court has already ignored the plain language of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to allow Trump to run for re-election despite being an insurrectionist.

So I’m not confident about the outcome. But that means we shouldn’t fight back as strongly as possible. And it would be great if some elected Democrats started to do more to inform the American people about what’s at stake.

Thank you for reading The Long Twilight Struggle. This post is public, so feel free to share it with your family and friends.

#5

How the roots of the ‘PayPal mafia’ extend to apartheid South Africa (Chris McGreal, The Guardian, Link to Article)

Musk is part of the “PayPal mafia” of libertarian billionaires with roots in South Africa under white rule now hugely influential in the US tech industry and politics.

They include Peter Thiel, the German-born billionaire venture capitalist and PayPal cofounder, who was educated in a southern African city in the 1970s where Hitler was still openly venerated. Thiel, a major donor to Trump’s campaign, has been critical of welfare programs and women being permitted to vote as undermining capitalism. A 2021 biography of Thiel, called The Contrarian, alleged that as a student at Stanford he defended apartheid as “economically sound”.

David Sacks, formerly PayPal’s chief operating officer and now a leading fundraiser for Trump, was born in Cape Town and grew up within the South African diaspora after his family moved to the US when he was young. A fourth member of the mafia, Roelof Botha, the grandson of the apartheid regime’s last foreign minister, Pik Botha, and former PayPal CFO, has kept a lower political profile but remains close to Musk.

Among them, Musk stands out for his ownership of X, which is increasingly a platform for far-right views, and his proximity to Trump, who has nominated Musk to head a “department of government efficiency” to slash and burn its way through the federal bureaucracy.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

And let’s not forget that Thiel has funded Vice President JD Vance’s political rise.

I think we should be asking more questions about these rich people surrounding President Trump. I don’t think they are spending their money to lower the price of eggs at the grocery store.

#6

I’ve had several people express frustration and feelings of helplessness during this first week of Trump 47. It’s been a tough week.

Ken White, who has been one of my favorite people to follow on social media, posted an important thread on BlueSky in which he shared ways that everyone can fight back against Trumpism.

I hope White’s suggestions will help people who are looking for ways to resist what is happening.

As White shared:

Not everyone can fight Trumpism and Trumpists directly. But remember this: kindness, decency, and fidelity to American values are defiance in the face of Trumpism. So be kind, decent, and faithful, particularly to the many kinds of people despised and attacked by Trumpists. That’s revolutionary./1

/2 It’s something anyone can do. Caring about whether something is true or not, and calling out lies, defies Trumpism. Treating people as humans even if Trumpists don’t think they are is defiance of Trumpism. Refusing to hate and revile Trumpists’ targets defies Trumpism. You can do that.

/3 Fidelity to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and to us all being created equal and endowed with those rights, defies Trumpism. Caring about values and principles defies Trumpism (and also nihilists, but why should they care?). Affirming that how you act matters defies Trumpism.

/4 The rule of law, equality before it, and freedom of expression, conscience, and worship defy Trumpism — whether or not some people have given up on them.

/5 Openly caring about and adhering to values infuriates Trumpists. It spoils their joy. They will never be happy because of it. Keep doing it. Decency is a thumb in their eye.

/6 Coda: I’m not preaching at you to be nice to Trumpists, but if you react to this by “what about Trumpists” you are missing the point.

Chances are you are already making a difference. Give yourself credit for it! And when you can, do a little more. These actions matter.

The Reality of the January 6, 2021, Insurrection

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING:

On January 6, 2021, Donald Trump instigated a violent insurrection against the United States government.

People were hurt and police officers died protecting the Capitol. Vice President Pence and other elected officials just barely escaped danger. Our national streak of peaceful transfers of power ended.

It was not, as Trump claims, a “day of love.” And we must resist his efforts to rewrite the history of that dark day.

Post-Game Comments

Today’s Thought from my Readwise collection:

“The golden rule operates like a technology designed to direct us away from revenge. It hauls you back time and again to the certain knowledge of what it is you don’t like. Do you not like it when people call you ugly on social media? Then don’t do that to anyone else. Do you not enjoy it when someone tries to get you fired? Then consider very carefully whether it is ever right to do that to someone else. I know, I know. It’s so boring to get control of your feelings and think about what’s right. But this is how we construct a society, OK? The golden rule is a vastly valuable social technology carefully passed down to us by people who fought their way out of darkness using it.” (Naomi Alderman, The Future)

Thank you for reading! This post is public, so feel free to share it.

Thank you for reading my newsletter. Let me know what you think about what you’ve read. Send me things you’ve found interesting! You can email me at craigcheslog@substack.com. 

The Long Twilight Struggle is free and supported voluntarily by its readers. If you liked what you read, please consider buying me some coffee to drink while I write it by becoming a paid subscriber or sponsor.

The Democratic Leadership Should Try Opposing

Here’s what I’ve found interesting: I wish Democrats would try to become an opposition party; Kamala Harris deserved better from Joe Biden; what Biden just did with the ERA is outrageous; our tech oligarchs are trying to avoid being Trump’s Mikhail Khodorkovsky; how Hitler dismantled a democracy in 53 days; the New Apostolic Reformation feels its power; Pete Hegseth’s Christian patriarchy; the danger of extremism in the U.S. military; and opening the DNC’s black box.

Here we go. I’m glad you’re here.

The Do Something Meme featuring White Ninja trying to poke the Democratic Party leadership awake.
Yep. I’m using the C’Mon Do Something Meme to nudge the Democratic Party Leadership awake and start acting like an opposition party.

#1

Now Is Not the Time for Surrender (Jamelle Bouie, The New York Times, Link to Article)

Democrats may be in the minority, but they are not yet an opposition.

What’s the difference?

An opposition would use every opportunity it had to demonstrate its resolute stance against the incoming administration. It would do everything in its power to try to seize the public’s attention and make hay of the president-elect’s efforts to put lawlessness at the center of American government. An opposition would highlight the extent to which Donald Trump has no intention of fulfilling his pledge of lower prices and greater economic prosperity for ordinary people and is openly scheming with the billionaire oligarchs who paid for and ran his campaign to gut the social safety net and bring something like Hooverism back from the ash heap of history.

An opposition would treat the proposed nomination of figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Kash Patel and Pete Hegseth as an early chance to define a second Trump administration as dangerous to the lives and livelihoods of ordinary Americans. It would prioritize nimble, aggressive leadership over an unbending commitment to seniority and the elevation of whoever is next in line.

Yes “Anticipatory Obedience” Would Be Harder If Democrats Weren’t Cowering (Brian Beutler, Off Message, Link to Article)

The most generous interpretation of the Democrats’ conduct since November 5 is that they intend to continue Biden’s failed experiment, responding ever more passively to events in the hope that the beatings will stop. It isn’t too much to expect that an opposition party will actually act like it’s trying to stop bad things from happening. Democrats should imagine how Fox News would fill its airtime if this were a Democratic transition, and then speak and react as if they were creating soundbites for a big, aligned, signal-boosting media company.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

Democrats were correctly arguing that Donald Trump presented a mortal danger to our democracy in the long ago time of—checks notes—November 2024.

But now we have Senators saying they want to work with him. We hear they are considering confirming even his worst nominees and looking forward to working with Trump on legislative priorities.

No. No. A million times, “NO.”

Democrats need to oppose what is coming. They need to stop thinking they can get something from Trump by giving in on a few things. Did they not learn from the first term that Trump is even more aggressive than Darth Vader was with Lando Calrissian at altering the deal whenever he felt like it?

How are voters supposed to understand how awful these Trump policies are if Democrats are providing votes for them? Why is any Democrat attending Trump’s inauguration after the insurrection he instigated in 2021? How will the public understand that Trump is bad if Democratic leaders are on stage yukking it up with his team hours before mass deportation events begin?

There should be no Democratic votes for any of Trump’s nominees (even you, Marco Rubio). Democrats should force Republicans to lose votes on bills—including the budget and the debt ceiling—so the media can report on GOP governing failures. Only then should they extract a high price for providing the votes that allow basic government functions to continue despite what the Freedom Caucus may desire. (It would be great if one price extracted happened to eliminate the debt ceiling, but that’s another post.)

As Ed Burmila explained on BlueSky:

Opposing the majority party is being the opposition party; signing on to what the majority party does makes you the junior partner in a governing coalition. When they succeed you get zero credit and when they fail you share blame. This isn’t hard, nor is it new ground.

I know which side I want Democrats to take. And if Democrats like Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin are unwilling to change, they should step aside for new leadership who understands the stakes.

The Long Twilight Struggle is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider joining for free or becoming a paid subscriber to buy me a coffee to drink while I’m writing this newsletter.

#2

Kamala Harris Took Joe Biden’s Ass Whooping For Him. He Should Just Say Thank You. (Stephen Robinson, The Play Typer Guy, Link to Article)

According to exit polling, 68 percent of voters thought the nation’s economic condition was “not so good or poor.” Just 29 percent of voters thought they were better off financially than they were four years earlier, and 47 percent of voters thought their financial situation was worse. A whopping 73 percent of voters were dissatisfied or outright angry with the direction the country was headed, and 59 percent of voters disapproved of President Joe Biden’s performance.

Still, Biden thinks he could’ve been a contender. He told USA Today last week that he believes he would’ve won re-election. I regret making such an obvious joke, but he is aware that he’s the sitting president? Those exit poll numbers are a collective vote of no confidence for the current administration. Harris is undeniably part of the administration, which is where her troubles began, but the buck stops with Biden, who remains stubbornly in denial.

There are people who’ll argue that racism and sexism is primarily responsible for Harris’s defeat, and while that probably played some role in the results, ultimately I think Harris lost because voters didn’t see the new, exciting Black woman candidate but instead the same old white guy they blamed for their expensive omelettes.

Harris was Biden’s running mate, but she eventually became his political Secret Service agent. She took a bullet for him, sparing him the public humiliation and rebuke whose clear signs he’d ignored for more than three years. He should thank her for her admirable service and accept all the blame he’d due, or at the very least, he could just keep his mouth shut as the nation burns.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

How dare he? It is absolutely not okay for Biden to throw his Vice President under the bus like this.

Biden’s inability to communicate his successes, his failure to be honest about his ability to run an effective re-election campaign, and his unwillingness to let Harris separate herself from his first-term agenda combined to sink Harris’ campaign. Biden needs to own all of that.

And I hope Harris is more than “disappointed” (as this Wall Street Journal story suggests) in Biden’s comments. I believe the key moment in the campaign was when Harris said on The View that there’s “not a thing” she would have done differently than Biden. Did Biden insist that Harris not criticize him as a condition of his dropping out of the race? In an election where the voters were signaling that—fairly or not—they wanted change?

Biden rightly told us for years that Donald Trump was an existential threat to our democracy. But rather than acting on that fear, his hubris (and the failure of the people around him) created the circumstances that erased Biden’s most significant victory—winning the 2020 election.

So, no. Biden doesn’t get to pretend he would have won in 2024. He wouldn’t have. The numbers are quite clear that he would have suffered a Mondale 1984 kind of loss and taken many more Democratic Senators and House members with him.

Biden may think he would have won. But, out of respect for Harris and Democratic voters, he should keep those thoughts to himself. A real leader takes the blame instead of pushing it off to others.

#3

What Biden didn’t do on the Equal Rights Amendment is more important than what he did (Erica Orden, Politico, Link to Article)

Legal scholars say President Joe Biden might be right about the Equal Rights Amendment — but his declaration on Friday has no legal significance.

In a surprise move on his way out of office, Biden proclaimed that the amendment has met the requirements for ratification and is now part of the Constitution. The ERA, he said, is the “law of the land, guaranteeing all Americans equal rights and protections under the law regardless of their sex.”

But what matters, legal experts say, is what Biden didn’t do: He didn’t order the archivist of the United States to formally publish the amendment. And he didn’t direct the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel to withdraw its written opinion that the deadline for ratification expired long ago.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

It is difficult for me to imagine how Biden’s handling of the Equal Rights Amendment ratification question could have been more harmful to the cause.

To throw out a statement like this in his last week in office and then not follow up with what would be required to enforce it is bad policy and worse politics. Biden has created a controversy that will make it nearly impossible now for the ERA to become the 28th Amendment without starting over.

That wasn’t helpful, Joe.

I have written in this space a few times about why Biden should direct the National Archivist to publish the Amendment. I agree with legal scholars like Laurence Tribe that the ERA became the law of the land when Virginia became the 38th state to ratify it in 2020. Tribe explains why the time limits and retractions don’t matter in our Constitutional framework and why there isn’t a requirement for the archivist or anyone to confirm it.

But whether the ERA is ratified is now in the realm of politics. Biden could have made this an issue in response to the Supreme Court’s stripping women of their Constitutional right to manage their reproductive health. It could have been an issue in the 2022 and 2024 campaigns. He could have fought for it.

Instead, we now have some words on a page from a lame-duck president who won’t be around to try to convince others of their truth. He politicized what should be an administrative process. And Biden won’t be in power to defend it.

So no, Biden gets no credit from me for doing something he should have done years ago in a way that harms the cause.

Once again, I ask: how dare he?

#4

Zuckerberg Will Host a Party for Trump’s Inauguration (Theodore Schleifer and Mike Isaac, The New York Times, Link to Article)

Mark Zuckerberg, the Meta chief executive who has tried to keep a distance from politics, is warming to President-elect Donald J. Trump.

Mr. Zuckerberg is among several Big Tech executives who are expected to be front and center at Mr. Trump’s inauguration next week. He will be one of four hosts of a black-tie reception on Jan. 20, joining the longtime Republican donors Miriam Adelson and Todd Ricketts in hosting a party “celebrating the inauguration of President Donald J. Trump and Vice President JD Vance,” according to a copy of the invitation seen by The New York Times. The event was first reported by Puck.

Tech CEOs flock to Trump’s inauguration (Sam Baker, Axios, Link to Article)

Just about all the biggest names in tech will be in Washington on Monday for President-elect Trump’s inauguration — a much different scene than the beginning of his first term.

Where it stands: TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew is the latest addition to the Big Tech guest list for Trump’s swearing-in.

Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Apple CEO Tim Cook, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman are also planning to attend, according to media reports.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

It has been quite an experience for me to watch our tech oligarchs fall all over themselves to support Donald Trump over the past few weeks.

Yeah, they are all working exceptionally hard not to be Trump’s Mikhail Khodorkovsky.

Who?

Khodorkovsky was Russia’s richest man until Putin made an example of him for breaking the deal that oligarchs could keep their money as long as they stayed out of politics. As Greg Rosalsky explains in an NPR Planet Money newsletter:

Khodorkovsky proved to be a capable oil baron and brought Western-style management and transparency to his empire. As corporations do in the United States, he spent generously on lobbying and campaign contributions to politicians in Russia’s legislature. He funded opposition political parties. He even hinted he might run for president. As his empire grew, he became increasingly strongheaded. In February 2003, Khodorkovsky challenged Putin in a televised meeting, alleging corruption at a state-owned oil company. Meanwhile, Khodorkovsky was mulling a merger with the American oil company Exxon Mobil. Putin and his allies hated all of this.

In 2003, masked agents stormed Khodorkovsky’s private jet during a refueling stop and arrested him at gunpoint. Authorities charged him with fraud and tax evasion. They imprisoned him in Siberia, where he would languish for the next decade. The government took over his oil empire and handed the keys to one of Putin’s longtime associates, Igor Sechin.

The threat of getting arrested, imprisoned, poisoned, and losing most of your assets seems to focus oligarchical minds. And Trump explicitly threatened Mark “more masculine energy” Zuckerberg with spending “the rest of his life in prison” during the 2024 campaign.

Our tech leaders are demonstrating that they understand the message sent and the expectations of them in a second Trump term. I doubt we will benefit from that dynamic.

Thank you for reading The Long Twilight Struggle. This post is public, so feel free to share it with your family and friends.

#5

How Hitler Dismantled a Democracy in 53 Days (Timothy W. Ryback, The Atlantic, Link to Article)

Ninety-two years ago this month, on Monday morning, January 30, 1933, Adolf Hitler was appointed the 15th chancellor of the Weimar Republic. In one of the most astonishing political transformations in the history of democracy, Hitler set about destroying a constitutional republic through constitutional means. What follows is a step-by-step account of how Hitler systematically disabled and then dismantled his country’s democratic structures and processes in less than two months’ time—specifically, one month, three weeks, two days, eight hours, and 40 minutes. The minutes, as we will see, mattered.

Hitler’s appointment as chancellor of the country’s first democratic republic came almost as much as a surprise to Hitler as it did to the rest of the country. After a vertiginous three-year political ascent, Hitler had taken a shellacking in the November 1932 elections, shedding 2 million votes and 34 Reichstag seats, almost half of them to Hugenberg’s German Nationalists. By December 1932, Hitler’s movement was bankrupt financially, politically, ideologically. Hitler told several close associates that he was contemplating suicide.

But a series of backroom deals that included the shock weekend dismissal of Chancellor Schleicher in late January 1933 hurtled Hitler into the chancellery. Schleicher would later remember Hitler telling him that “it was astonishing in his life that he was always rescued just when he himself had given up all hope.”

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING:

Yep. I am breaking Godwin’s Law (“As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.”), but even its originator Mike Godwin has said the comparison is meaningful when it comes to Trump.

But when we see the blizzard of executive orders that Trump and his team have promised for tomorrow, we should be looking for the dynamics Ryback describes in this article.

Trump has learned a lot from his first term. He will be ready to hit the ground running and has made sure the people around him will prioritize loyalty to him (and not concepts like the rule of law or the Constitution).

Will Trump use the Constitution to shatter the Constitution? Opposing him requires paying attention.

I want to add that Ryback’s book Takeover: Hitler’s Final Rise to Power was one of my favorite reads in 2024. It covers the final days of the Weimar Republic until Hitler’s selection as Chancellor. The Atlantic article I quoted above continues the story of the 53 days that it took for Hitler to become a dictator. History sometimes happens quickly—but I hope it doesn’t rhyme this time.

#6

The Army of God Comes Out of the Shadows (Stephanie McCrummen, The Atlantic, Link to Article)

What was happening in the barn in Lancaster County did not represent some fringe of American Christianity, but rather what much of the faith is becoming. A shift is under way, one that scholars have been tracking for years and that has become startlingly visible with the rise of Trumpism. At this point, tens of millions of believers—about 40 percent of American Christians, including Catholics, according to a recent Denison University survey—are embracing an alluring, charismatic movement that has little use for religious pluralism, individual rights, or constitutional democracy. It is mystical, emotional, and, in its way, wildly utopian. It is transnational, multiracial, and unapologetically political. Early leaders called it the New Apostolic Reformation, or NAR, although some of those same leaders are now engaged in a rebranding effort as the antidemocratic character of the movement has come to light. And people who have never heard the name are nonetheless adopting the movement’s central ideas. These include the belief that God speaks through modern-day apostles and prophets. That demonic forces can control not only individuals, but entire territories and institutions. That the Church is not so much a place as an active “army of God,” one with a holy mission to claim the Earth for the Kingdom as humanity barrels ever deeper into the End Times.

Although the secular establishment has struggled to take all of this seriously, Trump has harnessed this apocalyptic energy to win the presidency twice.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

That short paragraph above explains why I have been focusing on the rise of the New Apostolic Reformation and will continue to do so.

This article provides a great way to familiarize yourself with the New Apostolic Reformation, the Seven Mountain Mandate, and the Christian theocracy they seek to create.

The article explains why you see the Appeal to Heaven flag outside House Speaker Mike Johnson’s office, on Justice Samuel Alito’s flagpole, and in the hands of so many of the January 6 insurrectionists.

They aren’t trying to hide who they are and what they want. They are welcome to their beliefs. But part of this democracy is an understanding that we don’t have to agree with them. I’m not willing to submit to a Christian theocracy that will harm people who are LGBTQ, non-Christian, or opponents of the Trump administration.

#7

Why Pete Hegseth nomination is a milestone for the rightwing Christian movement he follows (Liam Adams, Nashville Tennessean, Link to Article)

To his brotherhood within a theologically conservative, hard-right church coalition, Fox News host Pete Hegseth’s ascension as President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Defense Department wasn’t merely opportunistic.

It was providence.

This church coalition, associated with a denomination called the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches (CREC) and mobilized by firebrand Idaho pastor Doug Wilson, has grown considerably in recent years by appealing to conservative evangelical Christians who are drawn to a more combative and openly rightwing temperament. Hegseth’s church, Pilgrim Hill Reformed Fellowship outside Nashville, Tennessee, is part of this recent influx to the CREC.

This success has gained the CREC-aligned camp a reputation as an important group in a broader movement on the religious right known as Christian nationalism, though it’s been slower than other Christian nationalist factions to curry favor with Trump’s inner circle. Hegseth’s proximity to the president-elect is changing that.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

The government is one of the mountains in the Seven Mountain Mandate and one of three spheres in the Sphere Sovereignty championed by the leaders of the Christian patriarchical church to which Hegseth belongs.

I suspect this is a big reason they are fighting so hard for Hegseth and why Republican Senators are retreating from their earlier objections.

I wish Democrats had spent more time focusing on Hegseth and the other objectionable Trump nominees over the past month rather than being quiet or seeking ways to work with Republicans.

A proper opposition party would have handled the last month differently. And Hegseth’s nomination—and what it means to people who believe our nation should become a Christian patriarchy—exposes what’s at stake.

#8

Extremism in US military is ‘sleeping danger’ says author of Pentagon report (Ed Pilkington, The Guardian, Link to Article)

The decorated combat veteran who led the Biden administration’s efforts to counter extremist activity in the US military has warned there could be further domestic attacks by individuals with current or past military ties if the Pentagon fails to take the threat seriously.

Both of the deadly incidents on New Year’s Day were carried out by discharged or serving members of the armed forces. The driver of a pickup truck who killed 14 revellers in New Orleans was a veteran with 13 years service in the US army, while the man who blew up a Tesla Cybertruck outside the Las Vegas Trump hotel, killing himself, was an active-duty Green Beret.

Bishop Garrison, who spearheaded an internal Department of Defense investigation into extremist activity within the military in 2021 and who became the target of a virulent rightwing smear campaign to discredit him and his mission, said that the New Year’s Day attacks should be a wake-up call. “Both incidents demonstrate the sleeping danger that we have failed to deal with as a country.”

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING:

This wasn’t the first time conservatives resorted to a smear campaign to try to discredit a report about right-wing extremism.

One of President Obama’s biggest mistakes was not fighting back when Republicans complained about a 2009 Department of Homeland Security report on Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment (link to pdf hosted by the Federation of American Scientists).

I suspect a Secretary of Defense Hegseth will see this dynamic as a feature, not a bug, towards his plans to reshape our military.

#9

Opening the DNC’s Black Box (Micah Sifry, The American Prospect, Link to Article)

But who will make this decision? Officially, it’s a secret. According to the DNC, there are 448 active members of the national committee, including 200 elected members from 57 states, territories, and Democrats Abroad; members representing 16 affiliate groups; and 73 “at-large” members who were elected as a slate appointed in 2021 by the party chairman, Jaime Harrison. For a party that claims the word “democratic” and insists that it is a champion of transparency and accountability in government, the official roster of these 448 voters is not public.

Michael Kapp, a DNC member from California who was first elected to that position by his state party’s executive committee in 2016, told me the list isn’t public “because it’s the DNC—it’s a black box.” He told me that leadership holds tightly to the list to prevent any organizing beyond their control.

Today, we’re going to open up the DNC’s black box.

The list we are publishing was leaked to me by a trusted source with long experience with the national party. Like Kapp, this person thinks it’s absurd that the party’s roster of voting members is secret. Indeed, since there is no official public list, each of the candidates running for chair and other positions has undoubtedly had to create their own tallies from scratch—making it very likely our list comes from a candidate’s whip operation.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

The Democratic National Committee is expected to elect a new chair (and other officers) at a meeting on February 1, 2025.

As you just read, the DNC has kept its membership roster a secret. That’s outrageous and counterproductive. The person who leaked the membership list to Sifry has done all of us a favor.

The DNC is not a powerful institution. But it does have more power when the president is a Republican. And sometimes, as Howard Dean’s 50-state strategy demonstrated, it can make a measurable difference.

If you care about the Democratic Party, you should care about this election. You can find out more about the candidates and see links to recent candidate forums on this website hosted by the Bay Area Coalition.

The Reality of the January 6, 2021, Insurrection

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING:

On January 6, 2021, Donald Trump instigated a violent insurrection against the United States government.

People were hurt and police officers died protecting the Capitol. Vice President Pence and other elected officials just barely escaped danger. Our national streak of peaceful transfers of power ended.

It was not, as Trump claims, a “day of love.” And we must resist his efforts to rewrite the history of that dark day.

Post-Game Comments

Today’s Thought from my Readwise collection:

“We are here,” she said to me toward the end of the night, “to take the pieces of the universe we have been given, burnish them with love, and return them in better shape than we received them.” She told me she had always thought this was the only reason to tell a story, to redeem what is broken in our world, and for what it was worth, I might keep that in mind.” (Sam Sussman, The Silent Type, by Sam Sussman)

Thank you for reading! This post is public, so feel free to share it.

Thank you for reading my newsletter. Let me know what you think about what you’ve read. Send me things you’ve found interesting! You can email me at craigcheslog@substack.com. 

The Long Twilight Struggle is free and supported voluntarily by its readers. If you liked what you read, please consider buying me some coffee to drink while I write it by becoming a paid subscriber or sponsor.

It Was A Violent Insurrection

Here’s what I’ve found interesting recently: I decide to go all Cato the Elder about attempts to rewrite the history of the January 6, 2021, insurrection; 10 corporations that have kept their promise not to donate to election deniers; why does the January 6, 2021, Capitol pipe bomb case remain unsolved; remembering the 2024 election day bomb threats, and Cory Doctorow’s novella about health insurance and murder.

Here we go. I’m glad you’re here.

A collage of newspaper front pages on January 7, 2021, featuring words like insurrection, democracy attacked, assault on democracy
The headlines on newspaper front pages on January 7, 2021, didn’t leave any doubt that the U.S. experienced a violent insurrection by Trump supporters

#1

Remembering the Insurrection (Nina Burleigh, The American Freakshow, Link to Article)

I’m not gonna pretend: today’s anniversary of the 2021 Capitol insurrection is thick with despair. The November election signaled the final success of Trump’s coup attempt and the lasting power of the Big Lie. While most of his fellow Republicans were horrified in the immediate aftermath of the bloody violence on that day, they failed utterly to eradicate his influence and were soon goose-stepping behind him, leaving millions of Americans without courageous leadership and subject to grifting right-wing influencers and a menacing MAGA army that besieged doubters of the Big Lie and flooded the zone with bullshit about FBI plants and Antifa.

Today, Trump celebrates it as “A Day of Love.”

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

No, we must not allow Trump to get away with rewriting the history of his insurrection against the government of the United States. Yes, he just won an election. However, we must not lose sight of the fact that Trump’s election win also represents the successful conclusion of the insurrection he initiated after losing the 2020 election to Joe Biden.

It wasn’t just his mob storming the Capitol. It was also the fake electors, calls to Georgia demanding just enough votes to win, lies about voting systems, attacks against innocent election volunteers, betrayals of our Constitutional order by lawyers seeking to justify overturning the election, and Trump’s tweet calling for supporters to come to D.C. because January 6 “will be wild.”

Trump’s election also represents the failure of our institutions to deal with a coup attempt against the United States government. Republicans who spoke so clearly about what happened that day almost immediately backtracked to bend the knee to Trump. President Biden prioritized making our politics normal again. Attorney General Merrick Garland waited too long to act for reasons known only to him. Reporters and editors insisted on treating Trump as a normal politician despite his ending our nation’s streak of peaceful transfers of power.

Trump will be president. He won the election. But I will make it a priority not to forget what happened on January 6, 2021.

Before the Third Punic War, Cato the Elder was famous for ending every speech he gave in the Roman Senate, regardless of subject, with a demand that “Carthage must be destroyed.” I plan to end my newsletters with a reminder that on January 6, 2021, Donald Trump instigated a violent insurrection against the United States government. Succeeding in our long, twilight struggle requires not allowing the erasure of this history.

The Long Twilight Struggle is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider joining for free or becoming a paid subscriber to buy me a coffee to drink while I’m writing this newsletter.

#2

Jan. 6 and the path not taken (Don Moynihan, Can We Still Govern, Link to Article)

Four years on, Trump is not a disgraced footnote in American history, but about to retake the Presidency. The long-term effects of his second term cannot be fully known at this point, but if we are to take him at his word, it will embed a series of anti-democratic practices.

The distance between the aftermath of Jan. 6 and today could not be more vast. Then, Trump was pushed off social media. Now, Trump has his own social media. Elon Musk has turned X into a pro-Trump site and is part of the Trump administration. Mark Zuckerberg visits Mar-A-Lago and listens to the national anthem being sung by the January 6th Prison Choir which is, yes, a choir made up of people accused of crimes related to the riot. Trump lent his voice to a fundraising recording for the choir. The song has been a staple of Trump’s rallies, along with his invocation of the attackers as “patriots.” This was a reversion to form: immediately after the attack, he spoke sympathetically of the attackers. Chastened by near-universal condemnation, he quickly called the attack “heinous”. As Trump would go on to rewrite history, many of those who previously denounced him stayed silent.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

Don Moynihan does an excellent job of reminding us just how we got to this point despite the near-universal condemnations Donald Trump received after the insurrection attempt.

From Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell’s decision to let judges handle the punishment, to former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s prioritization of his personal ambition over the national interest, to Attorney General Merrick Garland’s failure to act quickly, to a Supreme Court of self-proclaimed originalists deciding the plan words of the 14th Amendment don’t actually mean anything, to Democrats refusal to keep making an issue of the insurrection even after the work of the January 6th Commission, our democracy was failed by a multitude of leaders and institutions.

So we need to remember how all this happened, because part of the effort to make us forget is to ensure even history doesn’t hold these responsible accountable for their failures.

#3

157 Election Deniers Remain in Congress Four Years After Jan. 6 Insurrection (Prem Thakker, Zeteo, Link to Article)

This year’s Congress includes 137 members in the House and 20 in the Senate who fomented doubt or actively sought to overturn the 2020 election, per ElectionDeniers.org, a project of the nonpartisan pro-democracy organization States United Action. In other words, more than 38% of the Senate Republican caucus and over 62% of the House GOP caucus helped spread lies about the 2020 election results. The list includes the likes of Sens. Ted Cruz and Rick Scott, and the entire Republican House leadership (Mike Johnson, Steve Scalise, Tom Emmer, Lisa McClain, and Kevin Hern).

Outside of Washington, 10 of 27 Republican governors are election deniers, along with nine of 28 Republican attorneys general and four of 26 GOP secretaries of state. In essence, Republicans have hardly paid a price and have not retreated from what could have been a scarlet letter.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

This is the kind of result that happens when the Department of Justice and elected leaders prioritize restoring norms rather than holding the people who broke those norms accountable for their actions.

The way to restore norms is to make it clear that there will be a price paid for breaking them. I hope the next Democratic president will learn this lesson after the mistakes made by former President Barack Obama and President Joe Biden.

#4

10 corporations that kept their promises after January 6, 2021 (Judd Legum, Rebecca Crosby, and Noel Sims, Popular Information, Link to Article)

While most companies took the path of Amazon and AT&T, there are a few companies that have stood by their principles. Popular Information has identified 10 companies that pledged to stop donating to members of Congress that voted to overturn the election and, over the last four years, have not broken that promise.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

Popular Information has done great work keeping track of the companies that have failed to keep their pledge not to support election deniers and other supporters of the January 6, 2021, insurrection.

In this article, they point out the companies that have broken their pledge while highlighting 10 companies that have not joined those who have downplayed what happened after the 2020 election.

I’ll be trying to support these companies more going forward.

Thank you for reading The Long Twilight Struggle. This post is public, so feel free to share it with your family and friends.

#5

‘Lingering mystery’: FBI releases new details on unsolved Capitol pipe bomb case linked to Jan. 6 (The Reid Out, Joy Reid interview with Hunter Walker, Link to YouTube Video)

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

Speaking of events that have disappeared down our national memory hole, why don’t we know more about what happened with the January 6, 2021, pipe bombs? It’s been, after all, four years since they were discovered.

In this interview, Talking Points Memo’s Hunter Walker offers his perspective on the latest updates from the FBI and everything he’s learned covering the case over the past several years.

The potential pipe bomber walked within a block of the U.S. Capitol and near many local landmarks. There’s a lot of security recording going on in that area.

Yet we know very little more today than we did four years ago. Think about how quickly we learned about the United Health Care CEO’s assassin. What is law enforcement doing about this case? Is solving it even a priority?

I don’t expect Republicans to make oversight about this investigation a priority. I am forced to wonder, again, just what Democratic Senators were doing with their gavels the past two years.

#6

We can’t memory hole the Election Day bomb threats (Noah Berlatsky, Public Notice, Link to Article)

Though it’s largely already been forgotten, 2024 was not a completely peaceful election. Anonymous terrorists, probably working for Russia, sent bomb threats to numerous majority Black and Native American polling places in battleground states in an effort to disrupt voting and aid the Trump campaign.

The threats were widely reported on Election Day itself. However, in the aftermath of Trump’s narrow but definitive win, there has been little discussion of these egregious, deliberate attacks on democracy in general, and on the voting rights of Black and Native American people in particular. Analysts have instead focused on whether the Democrats and Kamala Harris should have run further to the left or further to the right or further in some other direction.

The bomb threats did not change the election outcome, so it’s perhaps understandable that they have not been a focus of the collective, apparently endless post-election autopsy. But the lack of interest in an egregious assault on American democracy is a mistake. The attacks demonstrate how fragile our democracy is. And they provide a blueprint for the MAGA regime to tamper in elections in the future.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

Yeah, remember what we heard about these on election day? Seemed important.

It is outrageous that these incidents have been forgotten in the aftermath of the election. We cannot normalize these kinds of terrorist attacks against our election infrastructure.

If Democrats win the House or Senate in 2026, a public investigation of these bomb threats must be a priority. That’s the only way people will reckon with these incidents. And it may be the only way to prevent a larger number of them in 2028.

#7

Cory Doctorow’s prescient novella about health insurance and murder: ‘They’re going to be afraid’ (Cecilia Nowell, The Guardian, Link to Article)

Five years ago, the science fiction writer Cory Doctorow published a short story whose plot might seem eerily similar to followers of the past few weeks’ news.

In Radicalized, one of four novellas comprising a science fiction novel of the same name, Doctorow charts the journey of a man who joins an online forum for fathers whose partners or children have been denied healthcare coverage by their insurers after his wife is diagnosed with breast cancer and denied coverage for an experimental treatment. Slowly, over the course of the story, the men of the forum become radicalized by their grief and begin plotting – and executing – murders of health insurance executives and politicians who vote against universal healthcare.

In the wake of the 4 December shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, which unleashed a wave of outrage at the US health system, Doctorow’s novella has been called prescient. When the American Prospect magazine republished the story last week, it wrote: “It is being republished with permission for reasons that will become clear if you read it.” But Doctorow doesn’t think he was on to something that no one else in the US understood.

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING: 

I am glad the American Prospect chose to reprint Doctorow’s novella in the wake of the assassination of the UnitedHealthcare CEO last month.

The novella tells the story of the radicalization of people who have lost family members to insurance company denials of care. The reader is taken further and further into the harms insurance companies create when they decide a life is not worth saving.

My initial reaction to reading Doctorow’s novella a few years ago was to marvel that what he described remained in the realm of fiction. The health insurance industry has harmed so many people in the name of C-suite salaries and shareholder earnings.

History demonstrates what happens when leaders fail to fix these kinds of injustices. The self-preservation instinct should lead to reforms. Yes, CEOs are getting more security now. But it would be foolish to expect that band-aid to last.

Quick Hits

  • Disneyland Reaches California Record $233 Million Wage Theft Settlement With Workers (Jeremy Fuster, The Wrap, Link to Article)
    Wage theft is a much bigger problem in our nation than retail theft. But I doubt we’ll see any propositions placed on ballots to hold company leaders accountable.
  • Study retracted years after it set off an infamous COVID-19 treatment scandal (Eduardo Cuevas, USA Today, Link to Article)
    Nope, hydroxychloroquine doesn’t help with COVID-19. But given our experience with the reaction to the Lancet’s retraction of the false study linking autism with vaccines, I doubt the incoming administration is going to be moved by such facts.
  • New Q&A Series, No. 1: Answering Some Extremely Easy Questions Asked By the Worst-Informed and Most Disingenuous Far-Right Billionaires on Earth (Seth Abramson, Proof, Link to Article)Bill Ackman asks, “How can someone with 53 prior arrests continue to be on the NYC streets?” It’s a stupid question, but it is important to understand how arrests aren’t convictions and how prosecutors overcharge defendants hoping to force a plea bargain. Don’t they teach anything about research and reasoning at Harvard? Or is he trying to say enough stupid things that we forget he lost $400 million on Netflix right before that stock took off to the stratosphere?
  • As if Times Weren’t Unsettling Enough, Saturn Is Losing Its Rings (Adam Gopnik, The New Yorker, Link to Article)
    For once we can actually blame it on the rain.

Post-Game Comments

Today’s Thought from my Readwise collection:

“Tony Blair’s new book, *On Leadership*, includes a joke that “feels accidentally pertinent”, says Tim Stanley in The Daily Telegraph. Some people die, and the Devil appears and asks them, before they go to Heaven, to look at Hell, insisting it’s not as bad as they’ve heard. They see Hell – full of “drinking and debauchery” – and ask to be damned. When they then wake up in the real Hell, and it’s “cold, miserable and horrible”, they angrily ask the Devil why it’s nothing like what he showed them. Ah well, he replies, “back then I was campaigning”. (The Knowledge, The “Disgusting” Hypocrisy of the Grenfell Cladding Firms)”

The Reality of January 6, 2021

WHY I FIND IT INTERESTING:

Over a period of years prior to the Third Punic War, Cato the Elder tried to rally Rome to a threat by ending every speech he gave in the Roman Senate about the need to defeat Carthage. In that spirit, I plan to end my newsletter with what I believe is a vital message for today.

On January 6, 2021, Donald Trump instigated a violent insurrection against the United States government.

People were hurt and police officers died protecting the Capitol. Vice President Pence and other elected officials just barely escaped danger. Our national streak of peaceful transfers of power ended.

It was not, as Trump claims, a “day of love.” And we must resist his efforts to rewrite the history of that dark day.

Thank you for reading! This post is public, so feel free to share it.

Thank you for reading my newsletter. Let me know what you think about what you’ve read. Send me things you’ve found interesting! You can email me at craigcheslog@substack.com. 

The Long Twilight Struggle is free and supported voluntarily by its readers. If you liked what you read, please consider buying me some coffee to drink while I write it by becoming a paid subscriber or sponsor.